Load factors, design airspeeds, and the flight envelope your structure has to survive.
Keep Option 1 or Option 2?
Turning comparison off keeps one option as your design going forward and discards the other. Pick which one to keep.
Design
Pulls category, weight, wing geometry, and speeds from a design open in Aircraft Sizing (same browser tab) — or paste a share link. Available from any step — loading a design always brings you back to Step 1 first, so you see what changed before continuing.
No design loaded yet.
Comparing scenarios — editing:Option 1
1 Load a Design
Use the Design panel above to pull in a design from Aircraft Sizing or a share link.
1 Loaded Design
Pulled from the sizing tool — edit there and reload if anything needs to change.
2 Load Factors & Design Speeds
Defaults below are starting points, not certified figures — see the note under each for where it comes from and how confident it is. Everything is editable.
2 V-n Diagram
The outer boundary — whichever of maneuvering or gust is more critical at each speed — is what the structure actually has to survive.
Maneuvering envelope — what the structure actually has to survive Gust load — separate from maneuvering; governs where it pokes outside the envelope Ultimate load (limit × safety factor) — structural failure boundary 1-G level flight / Vs1 stall speed Damage zone (between limit and ultimate) Failure zone (beyond ultimate)
Va — Maneuvering Speed
—
regulatory minimum — real aircraft often certify higher
Vc — Cruise Speed
—
Vd — Dive Speed
—
Critical Load Factor
—
Design Torque (limit, governing envelope case)
—
Does not include aileron hinge-moment or maneuvering-asymmetry torque — real wing torsion is very often governed by aileron deflection, not the clean-wing pitching moment alone. A large PASS margin on the Step 6 Torsion Check does not mean the wing is torsion-safe with ailerons deflected. This tool has no aileron geometry data to compute that contribution from (Aircraft Sizing doesn't design ailerons) — if you've computed a real governing torque elsewhere, use the override below instead of trusting this derivation blind.
Flap Condition Torque (T @ VF)
—
3 What You're Designing Against
Pulled live from Step 2 — if you go back and change load factors, everything downstream (this card, Trial Dimensions, Results) recomputes automatically the next time you view it, so you're always looking at current numbers, never a stale snapshot.
3 Spar Material & Form
Same material and cross-section form for both spars — dimensions are set separately for each in the next step.
3 Lift Shape & Wing Support
How the lift is spread along the wing and how the wing is held up. These set the bending moment and shear every spar is checked against; the spar material and form above only set what carries it.
Strut details belong to Wing Support: Strut-braced
3 Torsion Load Path
Construction Type is set on Step 2 — these inputs feed whichever path you picked there, not a choice made here. Spar positions are shared by both paths; everything below them is specific to one.
4 Spanwise Load Distribution
How much bending moment and shear are actually left at each span station, root to tip — using the same elliptical lift distribution as the root check below, just evaluated at more than one point. This is where a real spar would taper: loads drop off fast toward the tip, so a constant root-sized cross-section the whole way out is carrying far more material than it needs outboard. Split into Main/Rear the same way as the root numbers, by the Bending Share set on Step 3. Not affected by the Trial Dimensions below — this is load only, independent of what cross-section you choose. Hover either curve for the exact value at a station.
4 Trial Dimensions
Propose dimensions for each spar — Step 6 tells you if they're enough, same "propose, then check" pattern as the rest of this tool. Each diagram shows the selected cross-section shape and what each field name refers to, sized from that spar's own current values. Each spar's own "Solve for Minimum Size" scales that spar's currently-entered shape down (or up) to hit its own target margin — it keeps the proportions you've set, it doesn't invent a new shape, so it can't wander into a thinner-than-checked flange or web this tool wouldn't catch (this tool doesn't model buckling).
5 Section Transition
Optional — additional stations further out along the span, beyond the root. Loads drop off fast toward the tip (see Spanwise Load Distribution on Step 4), so a real spar usually tapers rather than carrying the root's cross-section the whole way out. These are separate from Step 4 Trial Dimensions / Step 6 Results — the root check isn't affected by anything here.
Thickness vs Span
Actual
Theoretical
Min Gauge
NoteNo taper stations yet
Not set up yet — the root-sized cross-section currently carries all the way to the tip.
FixAdd stations by hand, or use Auto-Generate above.
NoteNo taper stations yet
Not set up yet — the root-sized cross-section currently carries all the way to the tip.
FixAdd stations by hand, or use Auto-Generate above.
6 Spar Sizing Results
First-pass estimate only — simplified lift distribution (elliptical unless you chose otherwise in Step 3), simplified section properties. Not a substitute for a real structural engineer's sign-off before construction.
Summary
Torsion Check
Checked at the root (stressed-skin) / uniformly across every bay (fabric/truss), not swept along span — and this is provably sufficient, not a shortcut. Under this tool's constant-chord assumption, Am/skin thickness/bracing don't vary along span, so stress and bracing load scale directly with torque — which is highest at the root and decreases toward the tip (stressed-skin), or identical bay-to-bay (fabric/truss, since the distributed torque per unit span doesn't vary along span here). No outboard station or bay can show a worse result than what's already checked.
Main Spar
Rear Spar
Export & Report
Exports cover the option currently being edited. The print report is the curated record: results, torsion check and dimensions.
Backed by builders, for builders: Keep us upgrading.
The era of scattered spreadsheets is over. The future of DIY design is here, and we are sizing a real garage prototype using this exact math.